<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Gallowmere</title>
      <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:59:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>The Brothers Pete</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Time is a concept most abstract here in Gallowmere. From the sparseness of my posts lately and unfulfilled deadlines, it's pretty obvious. And to let you in on a secret, my books don't have timestamps, they are somewhere between anachronistic to just simply "achronistic". I avoid pop culture jokes, or commenting on events from present day in them. Though I may have elements which parallel certain things but take them to new ridiculous planes. But I often throw in objects and elements from time periods a little far back, and also make up technologies, cultural, and political customs which could be considered futuristic.

<img src="/img/pete_and_pete.png" "Pete and his brother Pete. " width="342" height="382" align="left" class="moveLeft"/>In my life, I am like Billy Pilgrim from <em>Slaughterhouse Five</em>; I'm unstuck in time. And right now I'm back somewhere in the mid-90s. A child approaching the double digits, a Canadian living in America, already weird, so feel like a space alien. I'm home from school, and what's this I see on TV? Two brothers with the same name planting landmines on people's lawns and disguising themselves as lawn inspectors to con people into getting them to remove the mines from their lawn so that the little brother could buy a jetpack. A superhero who might just be a madman who lives a a port-o-john, helping the boy out with a paper route and throwing the paper's so hard they almost go through people's chests. The same superhero later becoming a bowler using a ball that has a hamster in it that he communicates with telepathically. A crossing guard who can make people physically incapable of moving forward by holding up his sign. This is all in one episode <strong>The Adventures of Pete and Pete</strong>. It instantly becomes one of my favourite shows.

<img src="/img/mine_inspectors.png" "Act now! Stepping on the mines I planted on your lawn could cost you more than an arm and a leg. " width="472" height="384" align="right" class="moveRight"/>It's about two redheaded brothers named Pete Wrigley living in the fictional town of Wellsville in "The Sideburn State". Big Pete is a slightly dorky teenager who deals with sinister teachers such as a psychotic wood shop teacher who attaches different parts to his prosthetic hand (he lost the real one in an accident), and with the typical problems of growing up, figuring out if he wants to date his best friend Ellen, and dealing with his nemesis Endless Mike, a bully who has been in high school forever. Little Pete is who makes the show for me. He's a weirdo and a rebel who wears flannel hats, clothes too big for him, and has a different way of looking at things. He uses his own cuss words like "Blow hole" and constantly tells people to bite his neck hair. He often goes on surreal adventures, such as beating up the ocean, travelling back in time by crossing states during daylight savings hours, and befriending the elusive man who inspects underwear before packaging them.

Their father is pretty much Homer Simpson. He's fat, bald, mediocre at everything, and can be idiotic though well meaning. Their mother is a quirky character who has a steel plate in her head which is featured as a character on the show and is able to receive radio transmissions from around the world.

<img src="/img/artie.png" "Artie: The Strongest Man... IN THE WORLD! GNEAH! GNEAH! UUUUUUNG! " width="467" height="383" align="left" class="moveLeft"/>It has a very quirky and surreal sense of humour which I don't normally see in children's shows, hell, on TV altogether. Children's shows tend to be loud and silly, and deal with asshole kids who are unpopular but who would sell out their friends for any chance they could to be popular. <strong>The Adventures of Pete and Pete</strong> has a sense of humour sort of like what can be found in <strong>Get A Life</strong> (which I might review later) or <strong>The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai</strong>, though maybe not as outrageous. What makes it work was that though it is so ridiculous, it's played straight. As outrageous as the things are that happen, and as bizarre as the characters are, nobody ever seems to be winking at the screen, or being outwardly jocular in tone. It also had a fairly decent production value. It has a feel which is organic, and kind of cinematic. That's to say, it doesn't seem like it was just shot on a sound stage like the children's shows which will show in the 2000s like <b>Hannah Montana</b> and <strong>iCarly</strong>. And it has some interesting stylistic choices, especially episodes like "Tool and Die", "Halloweenies", and "Pinned!" (an episode where people actually get murdered, and murdered in ridiculous ways).

<img src="/img/tastee.png" "The only thing more frozen than his ice cream is his heart. " width="379" height="369" align="right" class="moveRight"/>While I personally have no heart, the show has some heart too it. Not at all saccharine, but its way of showing the close but sometimes wavering bond between the Petes who are year apart in age is very compelling. They're best friends, but Big Pete often has to deal with teenage bullshit and Little Pete has to deal with the oppression of being a kid. They also often give serious dimension to people you'd never expect, like the weird superhero, a crossing guard who never goes home, and the solitary Ice Cream truck driver whose head is a giant scoop of ice cream.

The musical choices are also pretty interesting. It doesn't go for music which was popular for the time, and it doesn't go for having the hippest playlist. The music mostly matches the quirkiness of the show. Such as the instrumentals of music from Stephen Merritt. The theme song "Hey Sandy" being played by grunge band Polaris on the Wrigley's lawn perfectly encapsulates the '90s. The show itself is the '90s; fuzzy, sophisticated but not high tech, slightly innocent but a lot of strange things under the surface.

Not too many people I know even know of this show. I don't think it ever came on in Canada, but season 1 and 2 are on DVD. Paramount put season 3 on hold, but I have ehrm... taped versions of that one.

I give this show <strong>'95/'90s</strong>

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/08/#000091</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/08/#000091</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:59:42 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Love Exposure</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Sion Sono is quickly becoming one of my favourite directors. His movies blend the subtle sickness and sad undertones of Todd Solondz's <strong>Happiness</strong>, and the over-the-top violence, sexual kinkiness, surrealism, and barmy horror of Takashi Miike's films of the late 90s and early noughts, you know, before he decided to become a jobber. The first movie of his I saw, <strong>Suicide Circle</strong>, got under my skin before I could realize it. And when I watched Strange Circus, I had to get back to it a year after watching the first 10 minutes of it because it had already gotten under my skin. Though of course, when I did watch it, it went in a completely different direction than I had imagined... then a million different more after that. That was the film where I started to feel the love. I've gone on to watch as many movies of his as I can find.

Two weeks ago, I sat down to watch one of his latest releases, <strong>Love Exposure</strong>, and my mind's still smoking and wobbling around like hot rubber. This movie is a four hour long romance/black comedy/action/coming-of-age/religious satire, not particularly in that order, though at times, all of these things at once. 

<strong>Love Exposure</strong> is novelistic in scale with its wide and wild plot which really allows the story to breathe. Its protagonist Yu Tsunoda is a young man whose mother dies only after telling him that the girl he should fall in love with should have the traits of virgin Mary. After becoming a widower, his father Tetsu, a devout catholic, becomes a priest. He is dedicated to his job, and adheres to his duties until a troubled woman literally barges into his life. They have a love affair in a house they rent far away from the church. The relationship goes to shit quicker than relationships usually do, and it sends Tetsu off the rails. His sermons become harsh and accusatory, and he squeezes confessions out of his son. Yu eventually commits transgressions which become increasingly more sinful to win his father's attention. This eventually leads him to getting caught up with a band of troublemakers who get into fights and shoplift. From there, it leads to him getting upskirt photos of girls, flipping and rolling around like a ninja and taking snapshots of their panties.

His father reacts extremely negatively to this, causing Yu to take even more pictures. His pastime eventually leads to him making a bet with one of his friends to see who can take the best upskirt photo. He loses, and has to dress up as a woman and kiss a girl while speaking in an effeminate voice. So dressed up as a woman named Ms. Scorpion, he sees a girl about to be attacked by a gang of thugs. He intervenes, kisses her, sees traits of Virgin Mary in her, and gets his first erection. The girl is Yoko, and it later turns out that this girl is the step daughter of Koike, the woman who had an affair with his father. To complicate things, his father falls back in love with Koike after she chases him down and knocks his car into a lake. Yoko is in love with the woman Yu was dressed up as, but has no interest in Yu himself. Complicating things even further is a creepy girl named Saori who has a profoundly fucked up past. She has been keeping a close eye on Yu, and eventually wedges herself into the relationship, saying that she is actually Ms. Scorpion. This is only the first hour and a half of the movie, and from this point on, it only gets weirder...

Having spoiled enough, I will just say that it leads to a genre hopping journey which involves a sinister cult, shady porn dealers, sex, seppuku, blood baths, and a whole lot more.

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie, and it has easily done for me what <strong>Taxidermia</strong>, <strong>Ex-Drummer</strong>, and<strong> Synecdoche, New York</strong> did for me last year in being the most wild and refreshing movies which pulled my intestines out of my navel and smacked me with them. The plot is weird, original, sprawling and unpredictable. The acting is over-the-top. The humour is absurd beyond belief, yet it has real heart (and various other body parts) to it. It had a decent soundtrack. I will always hear the second movement of Beethoven's seventh symphony anytime I think of this movie. The J-Pop wasn't too bad either. I think a couple songs did annoy me.

As for the cinematography, it was decently shot. There weren't any awe-inspiring shots, however, and I'm not too wild about it being shot digitally, and everything does look a little bright and colourful, but it doesn't really contradict the movie's tone. Also, a part involving a penis amputation sort of had its impact dampened by the fact that the penis was blurred out. I understand it's a legal issue as to why genitals both male and female can't be shown in their films, but it's a little disconcerting. And I find the law stupid.

If it's necessary for the theme, or subject matter, parts shouldn't be blurred out for the sake of a stupid law. Not that I personally need or desire to see full frontal nudity in every movie I see. Heaven knows I felt pretty sick after seeing <strong>Shortbus</strong>, but that might have to do with the movie being total trash.

I'm doing it... I'm going off topic big time. But anyway, <strong>Love Exposure</strong>: Brilliant movie. I like movies which are a little messy and loose, and as long as they're not too much so. That's what this movie was, and that's why I found it to be perfect.

<strong>10/10</strong>

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/08/#000089</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/08/#000089</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:08:24 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Life During War Time</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Any time that I watch Todd Solondz's Happiness, after sewing up my split sides, I have a knot of anger and contempt for humanity in the back of my mind which I can never easily shake. I like that knot, and I love the movie. The sequel Life During Wartime has left me even angrier than Happiness, but I can't say it's a good anger. It's anger from annoyance.

I have a problem with sequels. The only sequels that I can think of that I really enjoyed and thought were just as good or better than their predecessors are Toy Story 2 & 3, Batman Returns, Terminator 2, and Evil Dead 2. Most sequels tend to take what was good about the first film and run them into the ground. Then there are the ones which take what was terrible about their precursors and make them even worse, like The Dark Knight (there goes my credibility with the people who masturbate to comic books). Life During Wartime falls into the category of turning gold into manure. Maybe manure is too strong of a word, it turned gold into white bread. Nothing happens in it. It is totally inconsequential. 

Life During Wartime was filmed and most likely takes place eleven years after Happiness. It follows the three sisters from its precursor as well as the men in their lives. But for some reason, Todd Solondz recast everybody with different actors. I have no idea why. Part of what made Happiness so memorable besides the shocking content and ink black humour was its performances. Philip Seymour Hoffman as Allen, a pervert who gets off by making obscene phone calls, Dylan Baker as Bill, a pedophile father, Lara Flynn Boyle as Helen, an emotionally stunted author who longs for real suffering (reminds me of somebody), Cynthia Stevenson as Bill's naive housewife Trish, and Jane Adams as Joy, an aimless and hopeless idealist in her early 30s.

Following their lives a decade later, everybody is burnt out. Set mostly in sunny Florida, everything is bleak for the characters. They are all dealing with or asking for forgiveness for the terrible things the men did in the first film. Bill (Ciaran Hinds) has been released from prison, but has nothing to live for. Allen (Michael K. Williams) is married to Joy (Shirley Henderson) and is trying to curb his vice. Trish who was once worry-free and upbeat has become wary and burnt-out, on a countless amount of meds, and is trying to date again. Joy, while dealing with the discovery that Allen hasn't changed, is haunted by Pee Wee Herman who plays her boyfriend who had committed suicide in Happiness. And Helen (Ally Sheedy doing a grating impression of Lara Flynn Boyle's portrayal) does fuck all.

The movie worked in that it was definitely bleak and depressing. Visually it all has a murky tone despite being set in sunny Florida and the conversations are filled with awkwardness and gloomy dialogue. However, the movie is ultimately a failure. I don't know what Solondz's intention was for having an entirely new cast, but it's completely jarring. I'm not against this direction being taken in a movie, it worked in his previous film Palindromes where the main character, a 13 year old girl constantly changed size, age, and race in different scenes. However, that was a standalone movie, and the constant changes helped in telling the story and work in that contained universe. It makes the movie to me seem more like a fantasy sequence than a sequel. 

Missing from this movie are the disturbing shocks, the painful humour, and sheer cynicism splattered against a Norman Rockwell backdrop. This has all been supplanted with remorse. And indeed, the way characters in that hack Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins constantly "philosophized" about "fear", characters in Life During Wartime features characters constantly musing over "forgiving and forgetting". Also missing is a story. Nothing seems to happen for an hour and a half. They also injected a lot of Judaism into the film which I don't remember Happiness having at all. I don't remember the sisters being Jewish, but in this one they dwell on it a lot. Trish wears a Hebrew Chai symbol on her necklace, makes a big deal that her boyfriend is Jewish, constantly refers to Israel and her son is preparing for his Bar Mitzvah. I'm not against Judaism anymore than I am against any other Abrahamic religion. To be fair, it's a lot more innocuous than Christianity, and more pleasant than Islam than Islam. My problem is that I don't recall any sign of Judaism in happiness, and this one hits you over the head with it. It's what made A Serious Man so abstruse for me.

A lot of people who see Todd Solondz movies say that they would never want to watch them again because they are so depressing. I can more than handle depressing material, but I don't think I will ever watch Life During Wartime ever again because it was so disappointing.

<strong>5/10</strong>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/07/#000088</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/07/#000088</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:50:18 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Where am I?</title>
         <description>I don&apos;t know where I am. If somebody can find me, please rescue me. There will be a cash reward.

Oh wait, here I am! Alive and well. I&apos;ll go through a few updates as I dust off the dirt and branches I&apos;d been buried in.

1) I moved into my own private padded cell. In this cell, nobody can hear my screams, and better yet, the screams of my victims.

2) I got accepted into that Multimedia program at [Miskatonic University]. I&apos;ll be taking courses in graphic design, digital video, and animation. There are other courses later on that I would like to take like Digital Rhetoric, and the course on videogames taught by [Dr. Macintosh], who I&apos;ve had before. My degree will be a combined Honours in Multimedia and English. I am well aware that a bachelor&apos;s degree is less useful than tissue paper, which is why I am not getting that one alone. But my hopes are that the program will help me be a better writer, and more analytical reader. Though I am wary of the fact that getting too analytical can suck the fun right out of any medium. I fall somewhere in between, I guess.

3) I&apos;ve been sneaking in as much as I can for [The Noxious Novel]. I haven&apos;t gotten much done because my schedule had been hectic over the last month, but the realm of Gallowmere is slowly coming back into order. Or whatever order this world can be in.

So there&apos;s that. Soon, once I get my workstation in my cell set up, I will recommence doing my daily doodles. Until then...

See everyone in hell!

</description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/06/#000087</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/06/#000087</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:40:37 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>EfFacebook</title>
         <description><![CDATA[My friend [Spaghetti Western] used to post blogs online of his misadventures in the funerary world, mishaps at [Bric-a-Brac University] or hilarious tirades about everything else on planet earth. Eventually he stopped. I asked him why one day, itching for some vitriol to tickle my funny bone. He said he still did sometimes, but had been posting them on Facebook. I heard that name floating around quite often. And so I said, "Alright... You got me... I'll join this Facebook everyone speaks of." Later that day I did. What started as reading rants (which he eventually gave up on doing), ended up as me thinking up names of people I'd known in the past, and snooping to see what they were up to. There were groups like "Charles Bronson Fan Club", "Atheist Libertarians", "The Toxic Waste Guy in Robocop is awesome!" I could join which I started collecting for the sake of collecting. All was fine and dandy for a while.

Eventually, I started noticing how overwhelming it started becoming to me, and how annoying its prevalence had become. Wherever you see someone doing inconsequential texting, beside them you'll see somebody else on Facebook, updating their status with mundane details. Facebook started adding applications. Application, after application, after application. People passing them around like STDs in the early 80s.

I started feeling uneasy about how much people were putting out there, and how often they were. I alluded to my reservations of cellphones and texting, and I admit, I'm a bit of a Luddite. I like technological advancement, but I know that in most cases, if it's an advancement made for mass use, it becomes trivialized. This is why I project the 21st century predicted in the science fiction of the late 20th century will never come to be. Anything significant will not be in demand or get funding, and shiny objects which cater to the mundane needs of the hoi polloi will totally get abused and commodified.

Besides being a Luddite-Lite, a LudLite, I like privacy, a lot. I haven't reached the point where I burn my paper trail, file my fingerprints off, obscure my face in public, and go to live in a log cabin in the woods... yet. But I don't like to put myself out there. I'd rather not even let most people know the last time I sneezed let alone any other personal detail. My life isn't anything worth writing about... so why speak about it? And so for status updates, I usually had random statements or quotes.

For a couple years now, I've had my account set to "deactivated". I've snuck on a few brief instances, maybe once per quarter year if that, to see or read certain things posted by people who tell me to. Or sometimes I go into creepbook mode and "vet" certain people. Not something I can say I'm proud of, but we all have our dark secrets, most of them just seem to be posted on your Facebook accounts.

I had mostly been sitting with a sleeping account because I could never find how to delete it. But then the face of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg said something which creeped me out. He said:

<blockquote>"People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people. That social norm is just something that has evolved over time."</blockquote>

What the Zuck? Count me out. That was a while ago, but the news only hit me recently. That was enough for me to finally go on <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/05/14/financial/f135550D39.DTL&tsp=1">Google</a> (a company which ironically has its wacky ideas on how to treat privacy) and find out how to close it down for good. I found <a href="http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_account">this link</a>.

That was over a week ago, and now I have to wait another week for it to finally be gone. I still have to wonder how gone it will really be, but I'll just have to keep my eyes open. I don't count this as a victory against Big Brother. Obviously there's so much out there about me and of me that they could make a digital clone of me, and nobody would know any different. But this is a small step into the caves. Until then...

See everyone in hell, and not on Facebook!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/05/#000086</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/05/#000086</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:23:21 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Self-Portrait Gone Wrong</title>
         <description><![CDATA[So I started off trying to do a portrait of myself then totally lost it halfway through. I guess it sort of looks like yours truly. If you can find the pictures of me out there (there are about enough to make Thomas Pynchon look like an exhibitionist), you can see the uncanny resemblance. <center><img src="/img/sketch4_16_10.png" alt="Todd S. Gallows? Maybe if I kissed an electric socket." width="493" height="654"></center>

I don't know what I was doing with the cog and eye in the sky and the cloud eyebrows which could be perceived as giant floating turds. But I was just fucking around. Anyway...

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/04/#000085</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/04/#000085</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:12:33 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>This is embarrassing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I really don't have any art supplies. Understandable since art isn't/hasn't been my thing. I had to draw a picture of... something on the back of  the page I used for the other thing I sketched yesterday. I have no idea what it is. Perhaps a revolting piece of cake.

<center><img src="/img/sketch4_11_10.png" alt="A slab of cake from the New Year's 1976 party found behind a radiator maybe?." width="320" height="619"></center>

I'll definitely pick some stuff up soon enough. I have also ordered Preston Blair's <em>Learn to Animate Cartoons Step by Step</em>, to help with drawing in a cartoony style. Realism doesn't interest me. Plus I could learn to animate for who knows what reason. It's definitely not anything I can do anything with on say TV considering most animation, especially Canadian consists of stiff vector characters with smug looks on their faces standing around and taking two steps every-so-often (See <strong>6Teen</strong>, <strong>Max and Ruby</strong>). But the more things I can do, the better.

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/04/#000084</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/04/#000084</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:01:14 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Potage de Cauchemar</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img src="/img/dark_soup.png" "Potage de Cauchemar - Nightmare Soup. " width="476" height="445" align="right" class="moveRight"/>So classes have come to an end at [Miskatonic] University. I'm still recuperating from spending 36 hours finishing off a few final assignments. One which I presented right away in [Dr. Cossack]'s class. It was a mini-site with a gritty restaurant theme. It illustrated how Comte De Lautremont's <em>Maldoror</em> perfectly blended elements of surrealism and black humour to create a literary nightmare. She was impressed enough to give me an A+. Imagine how high my mark would have been if I started it earlier. That's out of the way, and I have a few exams. Then I will be free again to work on [The Noxious Novel] once again. My mind has been fertile with ideas. I have been gaining more and more interest in exploring my creativity through venues such as drawing and graphic design. I don't claim to be a pro at either, but I've got potential. The digital spirit of former coworker [Ophelia Leichenbestatter] advised that I do a drawing a day to sharpen my drawing skills, and I think I'm going to go ahead with that. I think I will post whatever I draw on here, no matter how pointless or horrendous . Even if it's a squiggly line. I will draw something... as a matter of fact, hang on...

There:


<center><img src="/img/sketch4_10_10.png" alt="Some random alien-demon-robot creature with a really big schnoz April 10, 2010." width="468" height="600"></center>

I don't know where I'll be going with all of this stuff. It could only amount to a hobby. That's just fine. My main focus is still storytelling. I already have to get a publisher for [The Obscure Opus] and finish off [The Noxious Novel] before the end of the year. I have also been toying with the nonfiction work [Cyanide For The Soul]. That one is a couple years down the line, but I plan on working on that as soon as these two buggers are finally out of my way. Anyway, I think I'll go off and do something productive now.

See everyone in hell!
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/04/#000083</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/04/#000083</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:03:26 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>It&apos;s either you or them...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Everything's the same but everything's different... You know what I mean? It's either you or them, so open your eyes and look at the world, Goddammit!

I'm still on the quest to find another opus which can really peel back my skull and molest my brain. <em>Maldoror</em> was a beautiful piece of ugliness, but I haven't really read anything since. Every time I submerge myself in something dark, disturbing, depressing, and bizarre, I feel like it may be the last thing that will ever do that to me. Not that having my mind violated is the most important thing, a good heart blackening laugh from a solid black comedy is just as good. Putting my mind into a taffy puller with something intensely surreal is always a pleasure. And an intellectually stimulating anything always makes a monocle grow out of my eye. 

I'm still working on [The Noxious Novel] which I hadn't for a while because I started flirting with the idea of submerging myself back into [The Obscure Opus]. Increasingly as I walked, ate, lied in bed, sat in crowds, my mind would drift back into the world of those characters. They would speak to me and say, "You know I would have much more dimension to me if you just blank, blank, blanked." They would sit beside me on the bus and whisper, "Remember the scene where blank, blank, blank? Wouldn't it be stronger if you added blank, blank, blank and made blank, blank and blank, blank?" A little devil who looked like me but wore darker attire, and the evillest of evil grins would tickle my eardrum with his forked tongue as he whispered, "Your prose is bland. Who do you think you are? Dan Brown? It's a book, not a screenplay, take some bold steps, make it ergodic literature, why not?"

Ultimately, I went back to it for two weeks before deciding to toss it back into the vault. I had an emissary put up an ad in [Miskatonik] University's [Literary Lane]. A cheap ad with little tabs to tear off the bottom, as if I'm selling an old microwave. Somebody did indeed tear one off. But the devil never contacted me. I sat by my phone and kept checking my <a href="mailto:toddsgallows@gallowmere.com">email</a>, but nothing. I was left hanging. The 12 foot candle I had sitting at the table melted into a blob in the shape of a broken heart. My spaghetti went cold, gained blocks of ice, and hopped into a Michelina's box.

If necessary, I will hire another emissary to stand in [Literary Lane] and wait for people to pass by, then harass them into taking a tab, getting their phone numbers and addresses, and staying on their cases to contact me. I find people edit books much better when under duress.

In the meantime, [The Noxious Novel] is really becoming more than I hoped it would be. I thought that it would essentially be Gallows-Lite, but I've bled as much of myself into it as I have with [The Obscure Opus]. Maybe not as much in quantity, but the same quality for sure. It's supposed to be a young adult novel, but I'm not sure why this one is and [The Obscure Opus] isn't. [The Obscure Opus] does feature sex, sometimes extreme sex, and I guess there are themes which more explicitly attack religion, politics, and culture. It is also more complexly written, and a character with a toilet mouth and ridiculous views could be taken out of context by younger readers. But that's giving younger readers too little credit. I've had customers who are little girls that fully embraced <em>Geek Love</em> and read Jane Austen (even if her books put me to sleep), and grown women who genuinely believe <em>Twilight</em> is the best book ever written. At the end of the day, it's the reader.

Siiidtraaaacked... Anyway, this book will be dark, funny, surreal, and unconventional. I do think that the judges for the contest I'll be submitting it to will have the gumption to at least not think that it's too offensive. I read a book that they published earlier, <em>Going Bovine</em>, and that book was pretty vulgar and surprisingly surreal. The protagonist was a shithead though. It will definitely be done in time for its submission. That's about it for now. So...

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/03/#000082</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/03/#000082</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:02:40 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Good Reading</title>
         <description><![CDATA[ It's been a few years since I watched Todd Solondz's <strong>Happiness</strong>. The first time around, I enjoyed it for how black its black humour was. It's a suburban satire along the lines of <strong>Little Children</strong> and <strong>American Beauty</strong>, but relentlessly darker. Not too many comedies involve suicide, pedophilia, fantasies of rape, and sheer misery. I decided to watch it again on the weekend, and since then, I have been jovially melancholy. I'm in a mood where I want to laugh about how much I think life is a farce. I get in these fits at least once a year. Last year, it lead me to the brilliant works of ugliness and sorrow <strong>Taxidermia</strong>, <strong>Ex-Drummer</strong>, and <strong>Synecdoche, NY</strong>.

Those were all movies though, I would like to find another book to make me feel angry, sad, or violated. I didn't have access to the Gallowmere private library, earlier, so I couldn't satisfy my urge when I wanted to. When I returned to my abode, I decided that I needed something which would help me keep track of what I have, and give me remote access to a list of my books. Something other than an actual physical handwritten list, of course. And thus, with a few keystrokes, I found Goodreads.com. It's a site where you can catalog books you have and designate them to lists of read, to-read, currently reading, and other custom categories. It is apparently going for a bit of a social network thing as well. I haven't used it much, and am only a little more than halfway with adding my books to it. I've done all the fiction I currently possess, but I haven't added any of my nonfiction books to it. As well, I plan on going through and reviewing or at least rating the books that I have already read.

My profile can be checked out <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/gallowmere">here</a>.

As for now, I may have found something which can fuck me up, Comte de Lautreamont's <em>Maldoror</em>. I confess I don't know much about it other than that it is a surreal poem about an unabashedly evil person/being who hates everybody and everything. I'm smiling already.

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/02/#000080</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/02/#000080</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:25:01 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>29 Days Later</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I'm beginning to notice a pattern now...

Any time I crack open the Gallowmere Wazoo to spill a few thoughts or two, it's in 29 day intervals. Well, at least for the last couple entries. No real good excuses other than life at [Miskatonik] University, figuring out what I'm going to do with [The Noxious Novella], obsessing about death (hint! hint!), and for a couple weeks, I'd been indulging my inner-geek with <strong>Mass Effect 2</strong> of which I'll say is a lot more polished than its predecessor, has a totally immersible universe, and excised problems I had with its predecessor such as a turgid menu, and boring  rover missions (replaced by a 1/5th less boring planet scanner), and of course, I'm enough of a narcissist to have his fancy tickled by the fact that I got to import my custom character from part 1 (made to look like yours truly). Canada produces some mediocre books, movies, TV shows, but they seem to get videogames right. Go figure.

Anyway, I'm here to say that I'm still planning on putting this site through a complete overhaul. I hadn't done much because I upgraded to Windows 7 Professional at the beginning of the year, and lost my FTP information for this site. I had it all on the sync software for the Palm One I had in the mid 00s. The actual PDA is history, but I had all of my important information on it... I thought I backed it up, but only the dates on the schedule survived. I let out a good "OH FUCK" and then pulled out a shrug-n-procrastinate combo. But finally, I decided to go and figure out how to retrieve it all. I got it back, and now I'm going to fiddle with a couple things or two to do this site. 

I will probably see what I can do next week since I'll be getting some time off. We'll see what happens.

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/02/#000079</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/02/#000079</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:45:13 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Sticking my head out of the shed</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Hola, Amigos!

It's about time I pop my head out out of the shed I've been hiding in for a while. I'm still here. No bites yet for [The Obscure Opus] that's to be expected. I can expect rejections possibly going into the double digits before someone makes a call which will require me to have a change of pants nearby.

For [The Noxious Novella], I wound up going in a totally different direction and started from scratch during the last days of last year, naively believing I could have about 200+ pages churned out by Dec. 31st. 

It was originally going to be a novella about an old man climbing 100 flights of stairs, each floor representing a year of his life. When reaching certain floors, he would recount particularly miserable moments of his life.

I had it all laid out, and had gotten a good amount of it done before deciding I wanted to do something different. Pour some milk on me, because I flaked. From the old man story, while working on his adolescent years, I made him as someone detached, and suddenly, I wanted to focus something entirely on this detached adolescent. From there, I decided I wanted to explore the notion of teens romanticizing death that my friend [Spaghetti Western] informed me of half a decade ago. So, I put them together, and basically, that's what [The Noxious Novella] has become now. And since its projected length is more than 100 pages, it should actually be titled [The Noxious Novel].

I project getting the first draft done by the end of the month and having my final draft done by August, then ruminate until I decide to send it no later than November 28th.

Also at [Miskatonic University] I have decided that I want to major in Multimedia with a combined major or just minor in Theatre and Film. I have enjoyed what I've seen of the courses in each programme so far, and I won't deny that I want to tell stories in as many mediums as possible, so it's only natural that I would dabble with Multimedia. As for Theatre & Film, I can do without the theatre part, but I love movies just as much as books, and during busy periods with school and work, I wind up seeing more movies on average than reading books. I wouldn't mind getting into movies some day. I mean, there was my short-lived porno career, but I would rather not discuss that now...

After seeing Charlie Kaufman's most polarizing, but (in my opinion) strongest film <strong>Synecdoche, NY</strong> last summer, I have been inspired to put getting behind a camera on my bucket list. I know, obviously ambitious, possibly even a pipe dream. Especially considering that at the moment, I can't even get a book published. The way I see it though, is that I'm still young enough to be picking umbilical cord chunks out of my teeth, so why not go balls out now before life catches up with me? Going balls out could possibly result in a smashed testicle or a torn scrotum sack, sure, but the pay off could be well worth the risk.

I know my limits, I can't save the world, cure cancer, fix a car, heat a house with a block of ice, change a diaper, or be a shoulder to cry on. I make stupid little mistakes all the time, and I would probably lose my head if it wasn't attached to my body. But what I think I can do best, and with comfort is tell a story. So, as long as a shelf of books don't drop on my head at work and give me brain damage, there will always be that to get me where I want to.

And on that note...

See everyone in hell (I promise a lot sooner next time)!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/01/#000078</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2010/01/#000078</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:00:45 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Darkly Deeming Dexter (quasi-spoiler free)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[[<strong>Disclaimer: This review contains allusions to moments which are spoilers but that are not spoilers themselves. Doing such a thing refrains from revealing major plot points, but may provide vague hints to what happens. This is done in many reviews, but most reviewers tend not to have the courtesy to warn readers.</strong>]

<img src="/img/dexter.png" "Dexter: Detached, Distant, Dark, Devious. " width="440" height="441" align="left" class="moveLeft"/>I'm not a big fan of television, but there's a handful of shows I still watch, even if most of the shows I watch have to be... obtained. One of those shows is Dexter. I found out about it around three years ago while roaming the aisles of [Pages] and harassing customers. I saw a picture of Michael C. Hall who I knew as the homosexual mortician David Fisher from <b>Six Feet Under</b> with his head being propped up by a dead hand and thought it was some weird spin off book. Then I looked further to see the title <i>Darkly Dreaming Dexter</i> and was charmed enough by the title to look at the description. The words "darkly comic" jumped out at me, and I liked the premise enough. It is about a likable blood spatter analyst who kills his spare time by killing people who kill people. A quasi-moral serial killer. Then I saw "Now a series on Showtime!" on the back and decided to make a point to check it out. So after that shift, I made an effort to... gain access to the 10 or so episodes which had already aired. It took two episodes for me to get into it, and the rest is history.

I really like the show because of its titular character. Next to the protagonists of Murakami novels, Dexter is one of the few fictional characters I can relate to. Like me, he's emotionally empty but pretends to be more charming and likable than he is. He is also a detached introvert who is at his best during his time alone to work on his craft. He is also immensely secretive, though he at least has better reasons to be. And while we don't have the same hobbies, who wouldn't want to play chop suey with the scum of society? It's a well done show, but one that isn't without its flaws. Each season brings something new to the table, but obviously, there are certain similar things to expect in each one. It's entertaining, and the stories are well told, but it's not without its plot holes, but that's fine, it's entertainment. Anybody who thinks of this as a slice of life needs to open a window and get some air.

<strong>Season one</strong> is still the most perfect, and surpasses the book it was based on. It was about a serial killer whose MO is slightly similar to Dexter's but he leaves the bodies out in the open, and bloodless. Eventually, the killer begins leaving hints in Dexter's apartment and at crime scenes which speak to him alone. It was great. It created a formula and got everything in it just right: Dexter's introspection (which I can never have enough of), Dexter's hunts, revelations of his past, Dexter befriending a serial killer/homicidal maniac who he relates to, learns to be more human from and then winds up being disappointed by. And of course, also the mystery, plot twists, and melodramatic side plots involving the other characters of the show. While not a puzzler, it was the most cerebral season of the show.

<strong>Rating:</strong> 9/10

<strong>Season two</strong>, I don't think I will ever watch again. It's my least favourite season of the show. It is still a cut above most television programming, but I was irritated with the direction it went in. It was a direct continuation of the first season. And from this point on, none of the seasons follow the books (which isn't a bad thing). It starts with Dexter feeling off his game, being pursued by a rival cop, telling his girlfriend Rita that he is "an addict" to cast off suspicions of what he really is, and an investigation is lead by FBI agent Frank Lundy after the bodies Dexter disposed of are discovered. It had all of the ingredients of the first season, but the poorly measured balance of quantities affected the quality. There was too much melodrama and personal bullshit. There is nothing wrong with personal drama, and I would rather have the characters have some form of depth rather than just act as tools for solving the cases. But they cranked it up a few notches too high, and it became more of a soap opera than anything else. Dexter and his girlfriend Rita's character also jumped the shark a bit from what they were like in the last season. Especially Rita though, who all of a sudden became a nag. It also had a few plot twists which I found to be a bit contrived.  Especially ones involving initial perceptions of Dexter's adopted father, Harry. And the main premise seemed to be trying too hard to hook people. Not that that's a bad thing, at all, but it did set into motion one of the major problems I had with the fourth season, this desire for the writers to keep viewers going "OH SHIT, WHAT IS EVERYBODY GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS NOW?!" The explosive finale more than made up for it, and is probably the only episode I'd look at again if I decide to watch anything from that season.

<strong>Rating:</strong> 5.5/10

<strong>Season three</strong> got the formula right again, and even toyed around with it a bit. It involved Dexter befriending a DA whose brother he killed spontaneously. There was also a side mystery about a serial killer who skins victims. He was the most uninteresting serial killer for the show so far. As I said, it got the elements of the formula just right, as Dexter would say, "It followed the code." I enjoyed the bizarre bromance between Dexter and Miguel, the DA. The series doesn't have that much black humour in it, though it is present, but I have to say, that season got it down the best. Their relationship reminded me of the one between Henry and Otis in <b>Henry:Portrait of a Serial Killer</b>, though not as disturbing, and maybe not as funny. Excellent season overall, and the most well done next to the first.

<strong>Rating:</strong> 8.5/10

<strong>Season four</strong> has been the most thrilling, and had the most intriguing moments, but was a bit of a mixed bag. I enjoyed it, but it could have been six episodes shorter. It involved Dexter adjusting to married life with Rita, who becomes even more of a nag than ever in this season. Special agent Lundy returns to chase down The Trinity Killer played by John Lithgow, who has been my favourite actor ever since I saw <b>Raising Cain</b> on TV when I was 8. As usual, Dexter befriends him (sort of), and learns a few thing from him. Honestly, all I liked if not loved about this season was Dexter's pursuit of Trinity. This one involves some of the worst side plots such as Dexter's family life, Debra wondering if she wants to rekindle the (over-written) flame she had with Lundy in season two, and a love affair between the two senior detectives Laguerta and Batista. Their love affair was the most brutal thing about the series. Yes, more brutal than any murder Dexter or Trinity could pull off. There was no reason for it whatsoever, their personal lives in earlier seasons were seldom delved into, except for season 3 which Laguerta's sort of had an integral role. Their romance does absolutely nothing to advance the plot or create any tension. If their scenes (which there are plenty of) were removed, nothing would be lost. The only side character who they did next to nothing with, and hardly ever do anything with is Vincent Masuka. He's one of the only side characters I kind of like. He's just the comic relief, and almost every line out of him is a smart-ass remark or a perverted joke. What's even funnier than Masuka's character is American media's lack of interest in Asian males. They can't catch a break. At least Asian women get to play the exotic romantic interests for the dashing white heroes of their movies and TV shows. But I guess anyone who wants to see Asian males as leads who are not geeks or martial arts experts can always watch Asian movies and dramas. My friend [Lotus Kai] swoons over those guys. a bunch of effeminate dandies. I think the problem is that when things are about minorities, they have to be about what it's like to be the minority, rather than a character being a character. And that writer's don't know what direction to go in with Asian American characters other than the usual stereotypes. They don't really explore the stereotypes with Masuka, and that leaves him with even less to do.

That leads me to the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=53493">race-baiter</a> who put up a video on Youtube ranting about the moral turpitude of the show and its viewers and asked if people would like the show if Dexter was black. My first thoughts were, "What a pointless question? You can ask an infinite amount of other whatif questions for any movie or TV show? What if Dexter were a hermaphrodite?" I don't think it would make much of a difference, so long as Dexter acted the exact same way and lived the exact same life. But if all of a sudden it were, Dexter the black serial killer and a good portion of the show dwelled on what it's like to be a black serial killer, then it would be a different experience. Though I admit, it could make an interesting black-black comedy if done by the right director. It's a premise that could work also, if the show didn't have a thriller element. If it were exclusively about the mundane duties of him balancing his personal life with serial killing, then fine. Michael C. Hall's character David Fisher in <strong>Six Feet Under</strong> did have to deal from time to time with the implications of being a gay mortician dating a black man. It wasn't entirely what the show was about, but it was an element, and it worked, but <b>Six Feet Under</b> was a different kind of show, a family drama.

Me and my tangents, I was doing pretty good too, until then... Back to Dexter.

While the premise for the fourth season was good, the writers seemed to have a hard time doing much with it. The first five episodes, Dexter avoids the Trinity case like a plague until something happens halfway through the season for him to gain a personal interest. Then the episodes are spent with Dexter stalling because he wants to hang out with another serial killer for a while and learn a few tips on pretending to be human. Then when he decides he's ready, his plans are constantly thwarted. I didn't mind all of the cock-teasing of the second half of the season, however, because a lot is revealed about the Trinity Killer's warped psyche which I quite liked. 

However, the last two episodes together could have been wrapped up in a half hour. Episode 11 was an exercise in fiddling around for 45 minutes to finally reach its titular climax. And now, after watching last night's finale  I have to say, the episode was sort of inert, but I can't say anticlimactic. The episode was much like the season and spent a lot of time on filler until it lead to its climax. I found it to be satisfying, though they could have spent a lot more time and sadistic glee on it after all of that wasted time in the episode. The episode had a twist which I only mention because they had been hyping for about a month. It is something that I figured out would happen only because they wouldn't stop pumping up how shocking the final moment would be. I ranted about this in an <a href="http://www.gallowmere.com/2009/10/a_pet_peeve_of_mine_1.html">earlier post</a>, but I will say it again, if you want to "blow the top off" of people's heads as they kept saying the ending would do, then they shouldn't have announced that there was going to be a twist. It's like telling somebody that you're throwing them a surprise party. Again, an overall good season, and I look forward to the fifth which I hope will be the final season, and which I hope doesn't figure the solution will be for Dexter to go to jail or die. And I also hope they won't hype up any twists.There are a lot of sensationalistic "OH SHIT, WHAT IS EVERYBODY GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS NOW?!" moments in this season. I think they relied too much on it, but, from a commercial point of view, I understand why. Shockers, and cliffhangers are an easy way to keep the conversation going. Ironically, the "big twist" ending didn't impact me that much and I'm not saying "OH SHIT, WHAT IS EVERYBODY GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS NOW?!". I know it's probably wrong, but, I sort of like what happened, at least the consequences and that it sort of fits. Still, the use of it, and its impact was pretty underwhelming and it seemed really forced. It would have been more surprising if they didn't use a pretty similar "OH SHIT, WHAT IS EVERYBODY GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS NOW?!" twist earlier in the season. 

<strong>Rating:</strong> 7.8/10

I wish that the show could be more twisted and less twisty. What I mean is that it could take weirder routes, not necessarily like the third book which had ancient gods and spirits, but go for weirder ideas. Have more characters who are unconventional than just Dexter and the guest serial killer friend. And have more twisted sorts of relationships. An example of what I mean by twisted as opposed to twisty is the ending of <i>Hannibal</i> which had Hannibal and Clarice, the detective pursuing him wind up becoming lovers and eating the brains of a corrupt agent from the justice department. Something like that is not really a moment which makes viewers say, "OH SHIT, WHAT IS EVERYBODY GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS NOW?!", but a moment which makes viewers say, "WHAT THE FUCK?! DID THEY REALLY JUST DO THAT? HOW DID THEY EVEN COME UP WITH THAT ONE?" The show, while it has dark subject matter, is kind of safe and is very accessible, which of course, it has to be. I'm sure it will continue to go in the direction that this season went in, especially since the ratings are apparently way up. But, just saying, it would be a lot better if it were a little more bizarre.

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2009/12/#000077</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2009/12/#000077</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:16:48 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>If I ever dare...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I might sound like a broken record when I say that I don't think I'll ever get married. The most persuasive reason for me to ever dare to get married is to avoid dying an embarrassing bachelor's death such as choking on baked beans that I'd be eating out of a can while wearing a greasy white t-shirt which hasn't been changed for two weeks, and while watching old sitcoms on a tiny old television. If I ever dare to, I will have to do what Robert Parker or Tim Burton do, and live in the same house, but split so that I have my own half and she gets her own.

Besides my view that relationships tend to be Rube Goldberg devices which clunk up pleasurable ends such as conversation, intercourse, and good company, my gravest concern is what gets buried along with me after I pass away, if I have to go first. I would hate to have my dying wishes defied. As what has happened to Vladamir Nabokov.

He is a writer whom I like, but I admit, need to get better acquainted with. When he died in 1977 he was in the process of writing a novel. He had ideas jotted down on note cards. He told his wife to destroy them. She never did. And now, 32 years later, after his wife passed the cards down to his son (don't even get me started on my thoughts on having children), it's been published as the most useless work of fiction I have ever seen, and I have to sell <b>Twilight</b> books. I was surprised to find out about it as I found myself shelving it the other day at [Pages]. I asked my boss [Amber Danielewski] if I could remove the plastic wrap of one to see what it was like in there. I wanted to see what made it worth 42 Canadian smackeroos. The answer: nothing.

The entire book is a series of one sided note cards centred in the pages. Now obviously, I understand the significance of Nabokov, and literary critics tend to barely contain their hard-ons over such memorabilia, I don't see the point of their publication. Not even a rough draft. Just a basic schematic. I'm as it stands, a nobody at this time, but even now, I would be mortified if any of any preliminary material for my work were made public. They are ideas which tend to make only enough sense to the writer to be used as a springboard for the first draft, and are subject to change.

What bothers me so much about it? I mean, on the other hand, I have read many works published posthumously, such as the work of Franz Kafka, who, like Nabokov said he wanted his work destroyed, and <b>2666</b> by Roberto Bolano, who intended for his work to be published beyond his life. And last month, I was doing cartwheels over the fact that a book of Kurt Vonnegut's unpublished short stories were released. The difference is that they were actually in the form of prose rather than just notes. Prose is a format more ready for public perusal.

To bring it back to having a spouse and children, they're not the only villains. It can be anyone, anyone who you trust to leave your work with. But in most cases, who else would people trust more to handle their intellectual remains? Given I a piano doesn't drop on my head, or some other spontaneous death blindsides me, I will make sure that if I feel my death impending, I'll shred, burn, and delete anything I have in the works that I don't want seen in the public eye.

See everyone in hell!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2009/11/#000076</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2009/11/#000076</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:06:25 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Speaking From Beyond The Grave</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img src="/img/birdie.png" "Psst! Look At The Birdie! "  width="256" height="334" align="left" class="moveLeft"/>A mountain load of books came in to [Pages] on Tuesday. Towards the final hour, second in command [Veronica Oxford] pulled out a book, she said, "You like this author, right?" I looked and recognized it was a Vonnegut book. His books all have a new style to their cover designs. When I was introduced to him, his books all had covers with giant Vs which alternated in colour depending on the novel, and a small square in the top with an image pertaining to the story. The new design has his crude illustrations, and as well, alternate in colour. So, mind-numbing details aside, what I am saying is that I thought it was just one of his older books with a new cover. But then I looked at the title, and also saw that it was a hardcover and realized that it was all new. It's titled <em>Look At The Birdie</em>. It's a collection of unpublished short stories. Needless to say, I'll have to pick this up soon enough. I wonder if bits of the last novel he may or may not have been working on will be in it. I'll find out soon enough.

See everyone in hell! (Except for Kurt Vonnegut who is up in heaven now.)]]></description>
         <link>http://www.gallowmere.com/2009/10/#000075</link>
         <guid>http://www.gallowmere.com/2009/10/#000075</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:17:30 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
